Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Having a first child at home is a serious

Having a first child at home is a serious
The reports found that mothers who give birth to their first child in the home they are three times more susceptible to serious health problems of mothers who give birth in hospital.

 
http://www.altibbi.com/global/img/website/news/2011/11/29/main-1150.jpg

A study by the University of Oxford that the danger to the child is still a little bit, and then there is the mother who risks in pregnancy and with children at home Having a baby to be safe for her and her child as if it brought into existence in the hospital.


Process of giving birth safely at home compared with hospital birth is the subject of much debate in recent years.


Conducted the largest study of its kind, in the collaborative group in England compared the results of more than 64.500 births in England, where the births in a variety of settings, including in the home, in the unity of midwifery, and midwife-led units based in hospitals and maternity units.


For women who have no risk in pregnancy, the rate of negative consequences for the child is low, Oabnsph 4.3 children among the 1000 children, regardless of where they were born women.


Included the negative results in children and stillbirth, the death of a child during a week of birth, brain injury, the presence of feces in the lungs and injuries the parties and the upper shoulders of the child.


But for women who gave birth for the first time in the home, the results were negative at a higher rate, was 9.3 of the 1000 births, compared with 3.5 per 1,000 births in the hospital.


The study found "that there was no significant difference" in the place when a live birth for the second or higher rate of negative results was much lower for women who were born second or third child in the home by 2.3 per 1,000 births.


Quoted women who gave birth for the first time in the house to the hospital by 45 percent while women who were born before was the rate of transfer to hospital, 12 percent, and this is because women who give birth to her first child is possible that the period of pregnancy is not complete or that it had requested local anesthesia over the extradural (epidural).


The births occurred at home or in a birth center can not provide assistance in the process of birth, such as epidural anesthesia (epidural), or the provision of tongs to the process of birth or a Caesarean section.


Said Professor Peter Brocklehurst, who led the study, that the negative results are rare. He said: "One of every 1000 women will be the outcome of 995 babies is born perfectly normal.



 
He added "These results should reassure pregnant women to plan and that they can decide on the place where the birth will be, knowing that giving birth in England is generally very safe."


Dr Tony Falconer, President of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: "The RCOG has always supported the right choice to give birth at home, but this study showed that mothers Allmata giving birth for the first time in the home are at increased risk of poor results for their children and this raises questions about the place of birth right among this group of women.


"This case is different for mothers who have no complications in the pregnancy overnight with In later gave birth at home or in a midwifery unit.


"So there is a need to expand these facilities with the midwifery staff and make appropriate choices to be there in front of women."

health

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

 

© 2012 Blog 7Health - Designed by Ahmed Mohamed Saad Zaky | دعم بلوجر | Sitemap

Contact Us